home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: itschere@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de
- Subject: Re: MiNT goes UNiX, invitation for mailing list
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 94 11:13:23 MET
- In-Reply-To: <199401110850.DAA23606@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>; from "Nicholas S Castellano" at Jan 11, 94 03:50:07 am
-
- > However, if compatibility and source code consistency are the desired
- > results of this project, I'd say that the creation of a splinter
- > version of the MiNTlibs is a really lousy idea.
-
- When I started the whole idea, I wasn't thinking of a new MiNTlib at all.
- I can't see why anybody should really want to abandon this trail. I don't
- want to melt UNiX and/or Linux68k and MiNT together, I just wanted to
- get a consensus on a bit more standard, and I won't need new Libs for
- that, so I agree.
-
- TeSche
- --
- PS: If the above written looks weird, then that's probably because it _IS_.
- Torsten Scherer (Schiller, TeSche...), University of Bielefeld, Germany
- ==> itschere@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de / tesche@hrz.uni-bielefeld.de <==
-